PDA

View Full Version : WALL STREET: MONEY NEVER SLEEPS (Oliver Stone 2010)



Chris Knipp
09-26-2010, 05:36 PM
Oliver Stone: WALL STREET: MONEY NEVER SLEEPS (2010)

http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/3002/wallstreet2moneynever00.jpg
MICHAEL DOUGLAS AND SHIA LEBEOUF IN WALL STREET 2

Review by Chris Knipp

Money naps occasionally

Oliver Stone's Wall Street sequel is fun, lively, and glitzy looking. But what's it trying to do? Though the original's main character, the yellow-suspendered, cigar-puffing "greed is good" capitalist Gordon Gekko -- a role that got Michael Douglas an Oscar-- was the epitome of the dangerous Eighties über-yuppie, now he's turned into something more "sympathetic." Not a good idea. Why mess with a villain? Gekko's meanness and lust for the win, his reptilian durability, were the point of the original film. He was scary, he was obscene, he was a troublingly ambiguous cautionary tale. He became a role model because viewers didn't care what Stone was up to, they wanted to live like that.

Now, 23 years later, Gekko is given a surprising new role: whistle-blower. He gets out of Sing Sing (where nobody awaits him at the gate), scrambles back on his feet, and in 2008 writes a book, Is Greed Good? all about credit default swaps and other toxic assets and how the system is feeding on itself and heading for a fall. In other words, while he began life as a creator of the financial crisis, he now warns against it.

It's a bad idea to spoil a villain, and to begin a story with its protagonist's repentance can lead nowhere. Of course the plot is leading to the financial crisis: that's the hook that got this movie produced. It dramatizes the early days when the Fed rescued banks to keep the whole system from going down, and the bubble burst anyway.

With a typical lack of subtlety, Stone has several scenes of kids blowing bubbles, and he lectures us on Dutch Tulipmania. Then, never delving deep into the psychology, he tries to orchestrate a symphony of Wall Street events, interwoven with righteous sabotage of a Boesky-Milligan type called Bretton James (Josh Brolin) by Jake Moore, a young ambitious kid from nowhere (Shia LeBeouf, replacing Charlie Sheen), who simultaneously attempts to reconcile Gekko and his estranged daughter Winnie (a weepy, yet curiously uninvolved Carey Mulligan) -- who, a bit too conveniently, happens to be his fiancee.

Gekklo proves to be a rotter -- again -- and Winnie, who runs a Hollywood-posh liberal website, proves hard to convince. Jake unwittingly latches onto Gekko after his firm's collapse leads his mentor Louis Zabel (Frank Langella) to throw himself in front of a subway train. Gekko cons Jake into getting him $100 million (just an opening chip in these games) and absconds to London, where he starts a company and parlays the money into over a billion.

Interestingly, Michael Douglas played (very well) a similar but more provincial figure -- a crooked car dealer -- earlier this year in the film Solitary Man, which also has Susan Sarandon in it, as a former wife (here, she's Jake's mom). In Solitary Man, Douglas' character has more depth and sympathy because the screenplay focuses on him and his attempt to restore himself after release from prison. Money Never Sleeps never considers the possibility that Gekko might have trouble attracting investors after eight years in jail, an issue that's central for the protagonist of the more realistic Solitary Man. Some of the financial stuff in the new movie is certainly true, though personal consequences of the great recession are never shown. The personal stuff that is shown is contrived.

What Stone & Co. have done pretty successfully is stage a series of striking set pieces. All one remembers of parts of the 1987 original is what people wear and the art work on the walls. Here it may be all one remembers, period. Money Never Sleeps is notable for the flashy lofts; Bretton James and Jake racing twin Ducatis; James after he's been ruined trashing a huge Goya; Gekko hawking his book in a big hall to an awestruck crowd, and later being fitted for bespoke London suits; New York looking like a million dollars, and a Manhattan fund raiser with jukebox lights and a roving camera that comes up close on the super-rich ladies' spectacular earrings. There are all those cameos, including several by Stone and Eli Wallach, still kicking. And the voices of David Byrne and Brian Eno singing duets appealingly evoke the Eighties of the first film. There's even a scene at the end that reminded me of Jonathan Demme in the same decade, when he was so great.

Allan Loeb and Stephen Schiff worked with Stone himself and his previous collaborator Stanley Weiser on the script, not so successfully. Too much is going on in this muddled screenplay, which in personal scenes is schematic and tone-deaf, and the stuff about the toxic assets and the Fed's rescues of big banks favors melodrama over clarity. Money Never Sleeps shows a mainstream movie doesn't have to be smart -- as David Fincher's The Social Network, with Aaron Sorkin's razor-sharp writing, emphatically is. In a story that needed focus and clarity, Stone shows no restraint. He plays around much too much with split screen images, animations, and other gimmicks. But the straight cinematography throughout by Rodrigo Prieto is continual juicy fun, especially when he is making Manhattan look like a chocolate cake studded with precious stones. And though LeBeouf doesn't seem smart enough to be a trader and delivers his lines with a fast Jersey slur, his energy is more convincing than Charlie Sheen's self-righteousness, as Tom Cruise's would have been (Cruise was the original choice for Sheen's role). This is a watchable film; it's just not one of the year's best. At least it's not thrown together quite so hastily and thoughtlessly as Stone's earlier effort this year, his biased account of new left leaders in South America, South of the Border. This is a team effort with some good collaborators, and for all the weaknesses, that pays off.

Johann
09-27-2010, 10:05 AM
Thanks for this review. Every review I've read on "Money Never Sleeps" is negative for Stone's latest.
I know that your criticisms are honest Chris.

I've been wondering if the films that Oliver Stone has been making since his Magnificent Alexander (my opinion only) are films that will have to be evaluated in years to come. When W. came out I refused to see it. It seemed wrong. Then I watched the DVD and understood what Oliver was doing and he was absolutely right on target. He was the only man who could have made a film like W.
And "World Trade Center" threw me for a loop. I fully expected a serious "attack" on the US, but no, Oliver focused on the event itself, no politics.
And what did that do? It showed that Stone CARES. If he just attacked Bush or did a Michael Moore inquest into the 9/11 "reasons" he would have proved his critics right. Late in his life Oliver Stone is making films for a specific reason. It is up the viewer to determine that reason.

His docs on leaders from "nefarious" "South of the Border" countries seems wrong too- I know Oscar Jubis has critical rockets for them, and he may be right. What was Stone doing there? I'll have to get the DVD's of those films to study them. Stone is extremely intelligent.
He has said that if a film should be made, then MAKE IT. He doesn't do these projects to fail. He knows exactly what he's doing, and I suspect that time will reveal his true aims here. (ALWAYS BE REMEMBERED!!!!!!!!) I love how Oliver looks too: a mustache like papa Hemingway. A TITAN.

If scenes are contrived in Stone films it means that those scenes aren't particularly important in the grand scheme. I know this from many hours of watching his movies. Larger ideas are never contrived. Specific scenes may be, but not the Large Idea that drives every picture he does.
some trivia: Oliver met Fellini in Rome in 1990. When Fellini greeted him he said "Oliver Stone! Big Hollywood!"

I'm looking forward to the cinematography. Rodrigo Prieto was the man who shot ALEXANDER and Julie Taymor's FRIDA.
A master DP in my opinion.

Chris Knipp
09-27-2010, 04:56 PM
Did not know that about Rodrigo Prieto, thanks. I wouldn't rate Oliver quite so highly, but he has been underrated. He has done things that ought to be done. His SOUTH OF THE BORDER is sloppy, but at least he did it. It was respectfully promoted on Democracy Now. Oscar commented that for him the film was too superficial, but might benefit hoi polloi -- like us, presumably; he gave me credit for knowing something more than the average about global politics, for which I thank him. Of course Hugo Chavez deserves a more critical look, but the thing is, in the US, he's automatically an ogre -- because he's a socialist--so he is not given a fair shake by the mainstream media at all. It is very difficult to get any idea from here of the plusses and minuses of his presidency. The Venezuelan opposition is fanatical and well funded, rich to begin with.

I do not think all reviews of MONEY NEVER SLEEPS are negative. The NYTimes one by A.O. Scott, whouth Metacritic may have rated it as worth only a d"70", had as many favorable things to say as I did. And I think people who come from the financial world like to see these films.

Metacritic will show you quite favorable reviews, and some raves, of MONEY NEVER SLEEPS: go HERE. (http://www.metacritic.com/movie/wall-street-money-never-sleeps/critic-reviews)

Johann
10-30-2010, 10:25 AM
You're the reason I never go into details Chris.
Because you do it so well.

Chris Knipp
10-30-2010, 10:29 AM
That's nice of you.

Johann
10-30-2010, 10:46 AM
WALL STREET: MONEY NEVER SLEEPS


That speech Gordon gives Jake about money being a whore who gets jealous and may not be in your bed in the morning was brilliant.
Love that bit of dialogue.

Oliver Stone has made a very enjoyable movie. An excellent movie. One that moves at a good clip, with a good story.
Michael Douglas should get another Oscar nomination and possibly win a bookend for his other Best Actor statuette.
He's awesome in this.
Why mess with a villain, Chris?
Because he's a changed man. He did hard time. 8 years. And when you are sequestered away from what happens on the outside..... (specifically, during the Dubya disaster- great way to bring us up to date on Gordon Gekko. Perfect way to bring him back. I love comebacks, Michael).
GREAT role. I was riveted by the character. Especially during that scene where Winnie & Jake have dinner with him for the first time.
When Winnie leaves, watch Gordon's behavior.
I said to myself that something bad is going to go down, because the look of focused concentration on Gekko's face....he's thinking "Oh, is that it? That's how it's going to be? Well I know something you don't...."

OK, maybe not. That's just me thinking what he might be thinking.
But what happened after that? I was amazed that Jake was so naive with his green energy ideology that he'd trust that Gekko would do what he said. It never once crossed his mind that Gordon has a "reptilian durability"? Thanks Chris. Good description of Gekko there.

And how on earth would Winnie go to Switzerland? She knew better than that. She seemed to be convinced to go there far too easily to me.
Whether she had no real attachment to the money or not, she seems way too smart to go with Jake to Switzerland.

The music was really great in Money Never Sleeps. David Byrne & Brian Eno. Beautiful songs with beautiful cinematography.
The shots of Jake and Bretton James on the motorbikes was awesome. That's how you edit and cut bike shots. It was short, sweet, kinetic, tight and bright colors abounded. Oliver Stone's films have arresting camerawork. His camera commands you to look very specifically.
Oliver has another cameo in a funny scene.
Eli Wallach is great. His twittering birds idea is something I'll always think about when I think about this movie. Really great to see him up there with no fire lost. I hope I get to be his age and be so sharp.

Shia Labeof (sp?) is turning into an actor. I was impressed with his acting in Wall Street. He's believable. He doesn't look silly next to Michael Douglas, Josh Brolin, Frank Langella or even Susan Sarandon. He holds his own with those serious actors.

Johann
10-30-2010, 11:19 AM
The sequence with the numbers and stock exchange ticker info criss-crossing and flying by the screen was an awesome use of special effects.
It was too short a sequence! I could have rewound that ten times! How did they shoot that/make that?!

I also loved seeing the do-rag gangsta get into a limo with his kids in the beginning when he's released from prison the same day as Gordon.
Who on earth would choose to shoot a scene like that but Oliver Stone? Love it.
I felt from the very beginning that Gekko was an angry man who was going to get revenge on his enemies.
He laments how much time he spent in jail compared to other criminals, seeing as how his crime was "victimless".

I wondered how much of the doom that is foreshadowed will actually come to pass.
How much attention should we pay to the real-life Wall Street bailout?
That scene where they plan the heist by "telling the truth" to get the federal government to give them the bailout...MAN....that's manipulation, that's GREED, that's pure, ballsy EVIL. And they fucking did it.

What was that about accounting for every dollar? Did the U.S. goverment prop up a systemic disease that has infected so many only to have no idea where the money went? Into a gigantic black hole? That creates ZERO jobs?
How about the information Oliver Stone gives us about gross domestic product revenue outstripped by MONEY and FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS?
These are things people have gotta think about.
We are all indeed "drinking the kool-aid"
We all believe in a system that is...what?

Johann
10-30-2010, 11:52 AM
What did you think of the end credits, Chris?
Was Winnie being watched by the IRS for not paying taxes on that $100 million? hmmm?

Chris Knipp
10-30-2010, 02:08 PM
Everything you say is true, but Douglas might have a stronger Oscar nom chance for his lead role in Brian Koppelman and David Levien's SOLITARY MAN. (http://www.chrisknipp.com/writing/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1515), released in May and now available (Sept.) on DVD. Check the pre-Oscar blogs: it's SOLITARY MAN that comes up over and over. That is a lead role, whereas MONEY NEVER SLEEPS is seen as a supporting one. I would recommend SOLITARY MAN to anybody who likes Michael Douglas as an actor. It is a very similar role to Gekko, a slick wheeler-dealer emerging from a long prison term, but it stays closer to the real world, you might say. For Ben Kalmen (Douglas' character) the road back is far harder than for Gekko. SOLITARY MAN is one of Douglas' best performances ever in a well-written film that has much to offer.

Johann
10-30-2010, 03:57 PM
Haven't seen Solitary Man yet.
Sounds good.

Johann
10-30-2010, 04:15 PM
I was going to comment on your New York thraed but I'm blocked.

Great series of films you got to see. Julie Taymor's Tempest sounds great. I hesitate to criticize her because her aims are so true but I can say from watching Titus (Andronicus, her other film adaptation of the Bard from 1999) that maybe she should've used less crazy jazz music or tempered some of Tamora's overacting. Other than that, she knows the texts of Shakespeare and that she really visually amplifies the production. She used Stanley Kubrick's costume designer Milena Canonero, Fellini's production designer (and graced so so many other films!) Dante Feretti, and an Ace cameraman. I'm in awe of how mammoth that production was/is and that she was able to pull it off.
On the special features DVD Taymor mentions a dream she had mid-production where every part of her movie was falling off a cliff.

The Godard also sounds great. I'll watch anything by Godard.
and THE SOCIAL NETWORK is a film I really want to see.
Oliveira is still at it..Wow.
Uncle Boonmee is also a must-see. Can't wait to check that one out.

Chris Knipp
10-30-2010, 05:09 PM
The Festival Coverage section is not open to comments and never has been, but the thread that's open for comments on the New York Film Festival 2010 is here. (http://www.filmleaf.net/showthread.php?2876-Nyff-2010/page4#post25213)