Bought and watched Star Wars Episode III
Comments:
Some images and scenes are breathtakingly beautiful.
Most of the voiceover work is campy, silly, and just plain juvenile.
There is no grace or fluidity to the narrative like there was in "Star Wars" and "The Empire Strikes Back"
The lack of logic and planning by the Jedi make them seem more like smugglers in the vein of Han Solo rather than zen sci-fi samurai.
Comments towards the end of the film annoy:
"Only the Sith deal in absolutes"? Isn't that, in itself, an "absolute" statement?
Let's imagine the Jedi in a slightly different way:
They are a mysterious, exclusive and elitist society that meddles in all aspects of society: a sort of a intergalactic Klu Klux Klan. Let's look at this phrase one more time:
"Only (insert derogatory racial epithet here) deal in absolutes."
Ewan McGregor and Natalie Portman lend real class to the film.
George Lucas muddled story is matched only by his muddled understanding of government and politics.
The script spends far too much time in exposition:
Weird Jedi guy: "What about the droid attack on the Wookies?"
Mace Windu: "It is critical we send an attack group there immediately."
Obi Wan: "He's right. It's a system we cannot afford to lose."
Yoda: "Go I will. Good relations with the Wookies I have."
Mace Windu: "It's settled then. Yoda will take a battalion of clones to reinforce the Wookies on Kashyyyk."
OK. WE GET IT! No need to repeat the point five times.
It's as if they are desperate to make it realistic that Yoda would be off Coruscant and "out of the way" so all the other plot lines can converge. Yoda's (and Obi-Wan's) mission gives them an "out" implying that Anakin would never have been turned to the Dark side had Yoda or Anakin been there.
Does anyone else feel as if these Jedi have been clueless and sitting around in councils while the galaxy falls apart around their ears?
Home at last after two months on the road
I was a bit disappointed by the Naruse Late Chrysanthemums. I was expecting Mizoguchi or Ozu and this wasn't up to that level.
I hope other people will see Three Extremes if it's being distributed now so we can get reactions, and I might write a review.
I'm also looking forward to writing a review of Bellocchio's Buongiorno, notte/Good Morning, Night, which seems to be getting limited distribution, starting in NYC; I have a DVD of it and have watched it a number of times this year.
Forgot to mention that I also saw North Country. I don't think it's got a very good screenplay, but the material is important, Theron's acting is commited and believable, and I was stunned by the material -- till the Hollywood ending and skimpy followup.
Jarhead may or may not be a well made war film. I'm not sure Mendes et al. knew what they were doing. But for me this film has a profound meaning. I do not agree with the critics who said it falls apart toward the end or that there's no sense of structure. I plan to write a review.
Oliver Twist is involving and vivid, well worth seeing. I was especially impressed by how brilliantly Ben Kingsley disappeared into the role of Fagin and kept the performance from seeming caracatured or cliched -- despite Dicken's extreme conception of the character in the first place. But the story is very familiar -- Imdb lists twenty versions -- and I should think David Lean's 1948 version will remain the classic cinematic version, unchallenged by this one. One of the reasons Polanski's doesn't challenge it is his cast hasn't the same depth.
Films I saw in Paris October 2005
Thanks for reminding me to do this, arsaib. I can't say anything unique to French release was outstanding, but here is all that I saw. Paris is a wonderful movie city, but you can't expect great stuff to be opening every week. The trouble is there were few surprises and few standouts other than Caché (which I could have seen at the NYFF but just missed). I admit to finding Les poupées russes very enjoyable. Klapish is an inventive entertainer and he started with a good given context. I didn't get excited by anything otherwise; but look, in my month on the East Coast before this, I saw forty movies.....and some of them were great....so it really didn't matter. There are other things to do in Paris. I could have seen Café Lumière at a special one-time MK2 showing, as I mentioned before, and I'm sorry I forgot to show up for it that morning.
Last year I saw more films in slightly less time and they seemed more interesting. Maybe it was because that was in September and this was October. Due to my departure date this year I just missed the opening of Woody Allen's Match Point, a shame because it sounds promising and I'd have scooped you guys, since it doesn't open here till Christmas Day.
The French language films I saw in Paris this time were:
Klapisch , Les poupées russes (12 June release, but still showing)
Sequel to L'Auberge espagnole, popular, with the same actors and others, near the end of its French run. Enjoyable, though not as unified as the first one. Kevin Bishop (William) is featured, a good idea because he was one of the most interesting characters in L'Auberge.
Alain Cavalaier, Le Filmeur (21 September release)
Idiosyncratic "no-budget" self-portrait shot over an 11-year period by the cultish 74-year-old director, shown at Cannes. An admiring description appeared in Variety . I found the narration hard to follow at times and would like to see this again with subtitles.
Richard Dembo, La maison de Nina (12 October release)
WWII story about a French haven for young Jewish refugees, starring Agnès Jaoui. Average in quality I think, this is a bustling \ little footnote to the many chronicles about Jews protected during and after the Holocaust. Malle's Au revoir les enfants is more focused and emotionally powerful.
Stéphane Brizé, Je ne suis pas là pour être aimé (12 October release)
A bittersweet, rather downbeat romantic comedy in which the star, Patrick Chesnais, is very appealing as the depressed bailiff who finds romance and a love of tango at the same time.
Michael Haneke, Caché (5 October release)
You know about that one!
Other films I saw in Paris:
Shane Black, Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (14 September release?)
Spoofy-noir with Robert Downey Jr. and Val Kilmer, this has done pretty well in US reviews, released a bit later here I think. I was too jetlagged to appreciate it; the French subtitles distracted me. Really it seemed too frivolous and pleased with itself, but there are those who will love it.
Eric Khoo, Be With Me (12 October release), Singapoorean film with multiple plots, this has been discussed on FilmWurld, mostly shown only in festivals. I didn't altogether buy or like this, but the director showed some assurance.
Wim Wenders, Don't Come Knocking (12 October release) Though it's fun to watch Sam Shepherd and Jessica Lange and some of the visuals of the West are handsome, this is a bit slim, not Wenders' best. The young Gabriel Mann was strong, if a bit over the top, as the pair's forgotten son, now a singer. I don't think this is coming here till March 2006; I don't think it's going to do very well.
Dead I am the One, Exterminating Son
The Devil's Rejects
Woo-eee what a movie.
Saw it 2 nights ago at my buddy Brent's.
It kicked ass.
A neo-horror film that pulls absolutely NO punches.
Several times Brent and I looked at each other, big shit-eating grins on our faces: "What the fuck is this?!?!"
Blood, gore?
A little.
Sex, violence?
A wee bit.
Dark subject matter?
A tad.
Killer soundrack and awesome shots (some are "frozen" for major cinematic effect), The ZOMBIE has really arrived.
The movie is a quasi-sequel to his well-received House of 1000 Corpses apparently, and I give it a HUGE "thumbs up".
sample line:
A "Reject" is owly in "the motel room", says (paraphrasing):
"The next thing you say had better be some Mark Twain shit, 'cuz it's gonna be on your tombstone."