Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: (Little Miss) SUNSHINE CLEANING

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    4,843

    (Little Miss) SUNSHINE CLEANING

    (Little Miss) SUNSHINE CLEANING
    by Oscar Jubis
    April 2009


    The trailer for Sunshine Cleaning states that it's a film "from the producers of Little Miss Sunshine". The producers at Big Beach Films hit jackpot when that film, budgeted at a relatively modest $8 million, grossed $60 million not including lucrative foreign markets and DVD sales. Little Miss Sunshine received numerous awards including Oscars for Best Screenplay and Best Supporting Actor for Alan Arkin. Roughly around the same time, the company produced Maggie Gyllenhaal's tour-de-force Sherrybaby, followed by Ramin Bahrani's wonderful Chop Shop. Neither film, particularly the latter, received the marketing and publicity required to compete with big budget films for the well-deserved attention of a general audience. The producers focused instead on replicating the success of the little dramedy that could.

    There are many commonalities between Little Miss Sunshine and Sunshine Cleaning: both are based on scripts by debuting writers with stories revolving around barely functional Albuquerque families. Both have a cantankerous grandpa played by Alan Arkin and a cute but insecure kid, and both feature a van as a major prop. In both films, it's the principal cast providing most of the sunshine despite inconsistent scripts and indistinctive direction. I found awkward or contrived scenes in both films. For instance, it's hard to believe Greg Kinnear's uptight, abrasive dad would persuade a stranger to loan him his scooter in the middle of the night when not even own relatives (save little Olive) take him seriously. The scene exists for no other reason than to move the plot along. It's pat and convenient like Steve Carell's depressed uncle running into his ex-lover at a highway convenience store. Sunshine Cleaning has a deplorable scene in which a school principal decides to play doctor and dictates that Oscar needs to take meds then expels him from public school when his mom Rose (Amy Adams) refuses. The principal is a caricature almost as grotesque and contemptible as Little Miss Sunshine's grief counselor and contest director. Cardboard secondary characters designed as subjects worthy of nothing but contempt and derision, like many one finds in Brothers Coen movies, evidence a lack of imagination and generosity.

    However, both films have their wonderful moments. In Sunshine Cleaning, I particularly liked the scenes set in hardware store involving the one-armed owner, Rose and Oscar, and the comic tension, often sexual tension, that develops between younger sister Norah and a phlebotomist who is also haunted by her mother's death. Both films give us the pleasure to watch Alan Arkin in the role that’s become his specialty: the gruff but lovable fuckup who knows exactly what his grandkid needs to hear. And both show that supportive, functional families can be formed by seriously flawed, troubled people.

    What's wrong with Sunshine Cleaning is that it ignores its most interesting premise. When Rose tells Norah: "I'm good at getting guys to want me. Not date me, or marry me, but want me", I expected the film to build a narrative around her learning what she needs to do or think to change that situation. The film either ignores the issue altogether or implies that what's wrong with Rose is that she's a mere cleaning lady. Rose doesn’t have to learn anything other than how to be her own boss, the film appears to be saying. Despite winning performances, there's not much to Sunshine Cleaning that inspires or edifies the viewer. It feels inconsequential.

    Little Miss Sunshine struck a chord with audiences by offering a corrective to the herd mentality of surrender to the cultural obsession with winning. The effort to measure up to a sanctioned definition of success is stifling and tiring. When Olive's family joins her on stage, Little Miss Sunshine shows the viewer how to dance to his own beat. And that feels liberating.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    15,840
    I've seen this, but apart from my knee problems that were demanding most of my attention (I'm recovering from the surgery now), I just couldn't get into it, and so I just let it go. I'm glad you've posted a review. The SUNSHINE/SUNSHINE comparison I was looking forward to making eluded me. I thought it would be interesting to write a review comparing the two movies, but I couldn't find enough to say about SUNSHINE CLEANING. I didn't realize LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE is set in Albuquerque, or had forgotten that. Actually one of the things I said I liked about SUNSHINE CLEANING was that its photography did give a sense of the Albuquerque landscape and unique NM light. Though you point out the similarities, I didn't really see any you could base an essay on. LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE is too cutesy, and it has an annoying, implausible ending (and doubtless other implausibilities), and above all it was overrated by desperate critics and a desperate audience, still it was entertaining from the get-go.

    That can't be said of SUNSHINE CLEANING. A "lack of imagination and generosity" would explain things. You've come up pretty short if you're missing both of those! It struck me that there was such a focus on the disgusting and repulsive, not just in the cleaning episodes but in other scenes, and yet they were never taken to the next level, either to humanistic acceptance of life's nitty gritty side--or, contrastingly, to gross-out comedy. I sure didn't find much to laugh at. But I didn't find much to be touched by either. Despite actors doing their best, I just couldn't connect. Welll, I coujld a little. The two women are appealing, and I too liked the one-armed hardware clerk, a very appealing guy.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Utah, USA
    Posts
    1,650

    A Experiential Look At Sisters and Their Evolving Relationship

    My IMDb review:

    Take Amy Adams ("Enchanted" 2007), Emily Blunt ("The Devil Wears Prada" 2006), Alan Arkin ("Little Miss Sunshine" 2006), and even Mary Lynn Rajskub ("24" television series 2003-2009) and the comedian actor Steve Zahn in a serious role and you have a rather interesting family drama that was billed more as a comedy. "Sunshine Cleaners" doesn't have the sparkle and delightful humor as "Little Miss Sunshine," instead this film captures more of a brief moment in time where by two sisters learn more about themselves and their relationship with each other. There aren't so much as explanations as experiences from which to learn from and nothing really turns out the way one might expect in this more realistic this-is-life perspective. The pacing of this movie is somewhat ragged and slow, particularly the first half of the movie. This movie provides no great insight, has a mild but solid twist at the end, and provides the audience with two decent human interest stories that reveal human development and human improvement over time. It's a positive if not stunning message about being human.
    I didn't find it necessary that these two sisters had to necessarily find close to the predominate fixation America has on successful relationships with the opposite sex. It was sufficient that the relationship between Rose and Nora was explored to the extent presented. I enjoyed how Nora's relational situation played out. I even found the ending relational balance between Rose, Nora, and their father also somehow satsifying. Sometimes having pat, convenience answers to all these questions pushes one into fantasy dreaming expected of our movies. For me, it's the little steps, realistic steps of evolving reality that mean more for me. Like what was so special in
    Lost in Translation (2003) wasn't any momentous changes in persons or situations, but the experience itself, like Chris Knipp's descent into experiencing New Mexico from the movie such that Sunshine Cleaning also excels in offering the viewer a slice of life experience that reveals the dynamics of familial relationships in a new and quirky way.
    Last edited by tabuno; 04-24-2009 at 12:05 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    15,840
    The pacing of this movie is somewhat ragged and slow, particularly the first half of the movie. This movie provides no great insight, has a mild but solid twist at the end, and provides the audience with two decent human interest stories that reveal human development and human improvement over time. It's a positive if not stunning message about being human.
    I agree with this passage of your review though more with the first sentence and less with the last sentence.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Utah, USA
    Posts
    1,650

    Not A Positive Message?

    Is Chris Knipp really saying that this movie isn't a positive message about being human?

    And what about the middle sentence? Chris Knipp has seemed to left out.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    15,840
    You could ask Oscar that. In quoting your sequence of sentences I meant I agreed with the first one more than the direction the successive ones were going. I agree with "provides with no great insight." I agree with Oscar that it has nice moments. When I said i couldn't connect with it enough to write a review, that should tell you enough.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •