Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: MARGARET (Kenneth Lonergan 2011)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    15,872

    MARGARET (Kenneth Lonergan 2011)

    Kenneth Lonergan: MARGARET (2011)
    Review by Chris Knipp



    Teen drama queen off the rails seeks justice: one of 2011's best American films is from 2005

    Margaret is a movie about New York life, particularly about an Upper West Side girl and her actress mother, about her school, her sex life, her moral confusion, her rage, and a terrible accident she's involved in that she can't let go of. It's a mind-boggling work, by turns exhilarating and maddening, containing absurd, overacted scenes but also moments so precise and hilariously true you've never seen anything like them. Margaret is the best worst screen experience of the year. It's unforgettable.

    Though he's written screenplays and an acclaimed stage play since, as well as for television, this is only the second film by Kenneth Lonergan, whose first was the prize-winning You Can count on Me, in 2000. Fights and litigation between Lonergan, editors, and producers kept Margaret in the can from its completion in 2005 until its limited release in 2011.It already seems dated, an artifact of the post-9/11, post-Iraq invasion era, but also universal, or at least archetypally American. There are other signs of the movie's date: two of the producers, Sydney Pollack and Anthony Minghella, are deceased. Matt Damon and Mark Ruffalo look decidedly younger and slimmer. And Anna Paquin was not yet known as a blonde telepathic waitress in the HBO vampire series "True Blood."

    This feels like one of those crazy, brilliant projects that ran away from its creator and left him struggling to protect it even when he saw it didn't fit the shape of a well-made film. It's unwieldy, operatic, unevenly paced. In fact it anticipates its own operatic excess, containing extended moments from arias by Bellini and Offenbach in live performance at the Met. A weepy embrace after the duet from Tales of Hoffman ends the film. Along the way there have been many shouting matches.

    In Margaret, which isn't a character's name but refers to the famous "sprung rhythm" poem by Gerard Manley Hopkins, "Spring & Fall" ("Margaret, are you grieving/Over Goldengrove unleaving. . ."), Anna Paquin plays Lisa Cohen, a seventeen year-old girl who distracts a New York City bus driver (Mark Ruffalo) just long enough for him to hit and kill a woman, Monica (Allison Janney), whom Lisa is with when she dies. This turns Lisa's life around, but her life otherwise goes on. The unwieldiness of the movie is because characters and scenes are extraordinarily rich and fully developed. We not only hear about the play Lisa's mother Joan (played by J. Smith-Cameron, Lonergan's wife) is in, but all about her nervousness about the play's reception and Lisa's impatience with that. And we see a scene from the play enacted on different eventings, as in a film by Jacques Rivette.

    Margaret's depictions of classrooms are typically specific and smart, like the one where John, the blunt-edged lit teacher (Matthew Broderick) has a simple interpretation of the flies from Lear, "As flies to wanton boys are we to the gods;/They kill us for their sport," and when a bright boy confounds him with a more complex, philosophical reading, he nervously sips his milk carton and moves on to the next passage. The kids are all specific, sophisticated, and smart. But in the civics class taught jointly by an older white man and a young black man what repeatedly happen are shouting matches between a Syrian girl advocating for Arabs and Palestinians and Jewish students taking a simplistic stance. Lisa takes one of the most screaming, right-wing positions: this is Bush-era politics, and New York's 9/11 trauma and anger are fresh.

    Lisa's free-flowing rage also connects with her sexuality. She breaks a boy's heart, and orders up a more experienced boy (a laid-back Kieran Culkin) like a pizza to come to her apartment to relieve her of her virginity. This takes place while Joan is on a date at the Met with her rich, devoted and cultivated new Latin lover Ramon (Jean Reno). Joan is too neurotic, selfish and confused to deal with Ramon's civility and honesty -- her loss. Lisa also takes her math teacher (Matt Damon) as her confidant, adviser, and a little more.

    Central to the film's complexity (as revealed in a go-for-broke performance by Paquin) is its young protagonist. Linking up with the victim's best friend Emily (the steely Jeannie Berlin), she goes on a quest for justice through a suit against the bus company. She can't resist contacting everybody, even going to the house of the driver, who becomes very angry (great performance by Ruffalo there). Emily calls her on her pose of righteousness, though, and she herself knows she's just an Upper West Side rich white girl acting out her mommy issues (with a well off divorced dad in California, adeptly played by Lonergan himself). Is she a knight in shining armor, or a spoiled, exploitative little bitch? She's both. The movie's profanity-laced shouting matches are over the top, but they're also the best scenes: in their operatic truth they're more real than movie dialogue normally gets.

    Lisa's crusade is a realistic exploration of the legal system. She, Emily, and the victim's cousin Abigail (Betsy Aidem), are successful through a specialized lawyer in a wrongful death suit that gets Abigail a lot of money -- but it's not what Lisa wanted to accomplish at all. Why should this remote cousin benefit? Lisa is not one to accept compromise and leaves the lawyer's office screaming expletives. Margaret is above all a study of what Richard Brody called, in an enthusiastic recent re-comment on the film, the "conflict between law and life, and between procedural justice and the sentiment of actual justice."

    Margaret gives you some remarkable writing and acting in individual scenes. It's easy to see why Lonergan would be unwilling to part with them, and also why fans of the well-constructed film would be driven up the wall by what seem like digressions. But these "digressions" provide a novelistic richness. It's all that's a "mess" about the film that contributes to making it so interesting and original. We need lots more "messes" if they can be as glorious as this.

    Kenneth Lonergan's Margaret began a limited release September 30, 2011. Due to growing interest it was presented again starting December 23 in New York City at Cinema Village, where it was screened for this review.
    Last edited by Chris Knipp; 12-22-2016 at 03:06 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    15,872
    Good news for Bay Area film fans. Press release just received this morning (January 18, 2012) from the publicity office of the San Francisco Film Society.

    MARGARET, 2011'S CRITICAL CAUSE CELEBRE,
    OPENS EXCLUSIVE SAN FRANCISCO RETURN ENGAGEMENT
    FEBRUARY 17 AT SF FILM SOCIETY CINEMA


    Kenneth Lonergan's Long-Delayed 2011 Film, Selected On Numerous Nationwide Critics' Top Ten Lists, Features Anna Paquin in Stunning, Raw Lead Performance

    San Francisco, CA -- Anna Paquin heads an all-star cast in Margaret (USA 2011), Kenneth Lonergan's ambitious and sprawling drama about a young woman coming to terms with her role in a tragic accident. Following its passionate support in best films of 2011 articles, Margaret opens an exclusive San Francisco return engagement February 17 [2012] at SF Film Society Cinema (1746 Post Street).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    4,843
    I am a fan of Anna Paquin and her consistent presence made the film worth watching for me. However, her performance is the redeeming factor. I didn't find anything "glorious" in this shrill, overwritten, overwrought mess. What bugs me the most is that it is clear to me that Lonergan does not like any of his characters. You Can Count on Me showed great promise and potential. After a decade of waiting for a follow-up, Margaret is a huge disappointment as far as I am concerned.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    15,872
    I'm glad you got to see it though you did not like it. Many will not, at this point. I think it is a very interesting film. It is certainly over the top. That's what makes it interesting. I have not seen it a second time to see how I react, but I am glad I did get to see it, and I understood the praise (not universal by any means) of numerous critics. I think we need more films like this. It appears to me unfortunate that Lonergan got hung up in disputes and litigation over the edit of this film for six years and that caused him to be tied up so long with it before during and after its making. I hope he will move on and believe he can make fine films in future. YOU CAN COUNT ON ME was not better than MARGARET. It was good. It was more conventional. It worked. Polls have their limitations but there are reasons why MARGARET came out #7 on the Village Voice Critics' Poll, and appeared on many ten best lists. It was welcome for its depth, intensity, complexity, and originality. Yes it is shrill at times; very shrill. That is how it is made. And it's an American film about real American lives, and a film for grownups dealing with basic experience, moral decisions, death, growing up, the law, family, school, and class. My use of the word "glorious" by the way is in coordination with "mess." It is a glorious mess. Important to see that. Take the word "glorious" by itself and you distort what I said.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    15,872
    P.s. Saw Sokurov's FAUST tonight, the first day of Film Comment Selects. It's a "glorious mess" too.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    15,872

    Todd Heisler/The New York Times

    Great new piece (June 19, 2012) in the New York Times by Joel Lovell about Margaret:

    "Kenneth Lonergan’s Thwarted Masterpiece."

    Think back on the last time you saw Kenneth Lonergan’s 2000 film, “You Can Count On Me.” Do you remember how good it was? The intellectual and emotional complexity of the script? Those remarkable performances by Mark Ruffalo and Laura Linney? . . .

    You may have wondered why Lonergan never made another movie. Or you may know that he did: a film called “Margaret,” which might be even better than “You Can Count On Me.”. . .when Lonergan began shooting the film in 2005, after taking two years to write the screenplay, “Margaret” had a lot going for it. When it was finally released six years later, in late 2011 — after a brutal and bitter editing process; a failed attempt by no less a cinematic eminence than Martin Scorsese to save the project; and the filing of three lawsuits — several serious film people called it a masterpiece. And almost no one saw it. . .

    In one sense, Lonergan’s long battle over “Margaret” is a familiar filmmaking parable: art versus money; a clash of creative visions; a promising project mangled in the gears of the Hollywood apparatus. The only question is where the tale of “Margaret” falls on the continuum of famous Hollywood debacles, which ranges from, say, “Heaven’s Gate” — the bloated, massively expensive 1980 Western that essentially ended the career of its director, Michael Cimino, whose previous film “The Deer Hunter” won five Oscars — on one end to, say, “Apocalypse Now” on the other, the bloated, massively expensive Vietnam film by Francis Ford Coppola, which is now universally regarded as a masterpiece.--NYTimes, Joel Lovell.
    Read the whole article here.
    Last edited by Chris Knipp; 12-22-2016 at 03:11 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •