Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: THE MASTER (Paul Thomas Anderson 2012)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    15,871

    THE MASTER (Paul Thomas Anderson 2012)

    Paul Thomas Anderson: THE MASTER (2012)



    Two men in a room

    Paul Thomas Anderson's The Master is itself masterful, as one would expect from this director. And that means control. Though the two stars, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Joaquin Phoenix, are intense actors playing flamboyant roles, they disappear into them more than you might anticipate -- we know who's in charge of the action. This was shot on film for 70mm projection and that normally means an epic quality, but Anderson by his own choice makes the scale feel intimate. Another qualification: the brilliantly managed cult called The Cause of which Lancaster Dodd (Hoffman), known to followers as The Master, is the founder and leader, clearly refers to L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology, but that's not all Anderson is after. His greater interest is the mysterious bond that develops between Dodd and one Freddie Quell (Phoenix), a crazed World War II Navy vet who served in the Pacific Theater, then by chance becomes the cult leader's boon companion and erstwhile right hand man -- but also remains his most untamable rebel follower. A kind of father-child relationship (so much the topic of There Will Be Blood) springs up between the two men. Dodd cannot tamp down Freddie's animalistic and childlike nature, quell his tendency to sudden violence, or cure his rampant alcoholism. These and his psychosexual abnormalities can't be blamed on the War. Nor is anything resolved for us. But the beauty of Anderson's intractable, impressive film is the compulsively watchable series of intense encounters between the two men. At their best these don't feel quite like the action of any previous film. But one thing was familiar. Watching The Master left me with the same kind of intense reverberating memories I used to carry away from a movie long ago but rarely do any more. It's a P.T. Anderson feeling.

    Joaquim Phoenix was considered one of the hardest working actors in Hollywood. Then I'm Still Here and its too convincing promotional campaign made people wonder if he had become unemployable. But maybe when Anderson watched the TV spots and the movie that followed he saw just the quality that he wanted. (He had already used Hoffman four times before.) Anderson obviously likes virtuoso, larger-than-life actors. He also has a gift for casting and like Tarantino for reviving moribund careers. This movie is built around the wayward friend more than the cult leader, because he is the more enigmatic one. Even during the war Freddie Quell acts crazy. Before he meets Lancaster Dodd he gets fired or bombs out of one job after another. The most surprising and visual one, and an opportunity for Anderson to display a veritable cadenza of lush period feel, comes when Freddie, practicing a skill learned in the War, gets to be a portrait photographer at Capwell's Department Store, in Stockton, California. Then he stows away on a boat and is taken in tow by "The Master." Dodd washes brains and creates acolytes. Perhaps Freddie appeals to him because he's such a hard case, a challenge. More than that: he's an ungovernable force of nature. (This performance doesn't remove suspicions that Phoenix is a very strange individual; but his strangeness has been husbanded in the cause of Art.) Dodd also takes things from Freddie. He likes, even seems to deeply crave, the lethal moonshine cocktails Freddie makes laced with paint thinner or with whatever else happens to be at hand. He also likes Freddie's Kools. We may speculate that Dodd admires Freddie's ungovernable wildness, which his followers lack. Maybe he craves it.

    The two men's faces dominate the screen in giant closeups and are in strong contrast to each other. Hoffman's is offten reddish, beginning with scenes on the borrowed boat where he would be sunburned. Phoenix's face is not just deeply lined, but even twisted-looking, misshapen; the camera dwells on his lack of symmetry. The strange hunched-over look his upper body has always had now seems to have increased. He frequently plants his hands on his hips and thrusts up his shoulders, as if to hide it, and walks with a back-and-forth swinging gait. No longer remotely handsome, his face seems that of a different person from the actor's earlier days. Freddie's frequent explosions into violence -- and even more often his bursts of spontaneous laughter -- seem all too real. Hoffman on the other hand tones down former theatrical mannerisms. His suave, sympathetic Lancaster Dodd performance is more interesting than it might have been because it goes for charisma rather than caricature. The jokey moments in Dodd's speeches to the converted are a masterful touch: we see through them but also feel the signature charm they would have for devotees.

    Anderson films and edits scenes, as did Kubrick, to make them intense and hypnotic, and there's a fine irony in the Master's detractor accusing him of being "a hypnotist." Anderson likes to jump from one sequence to the next without a smooth transition, and he indulges in some dubious sudden flashbacks. But The Master focuses on dialogues and encounters rather than big set pieces. The interrogations and clearing sessions are the only set pieces, their emphasis on simple action, not elaborate mise-en-scene. In one early encounter Dodd asks Freddie repeated short questions, one of his ways of "processing" people. Here it's as if nobody, even the actors, knows what the answers will be. It could be improv or it could be highly rehearsed. In any case Phoenix is riveting. Anderson is brilliantly attentive to the elements of image, sequence, music, acting, but he makes them very much secondary to character here, focusing on an overriding sense of these two men and their impossible, compulsive, and inexplicable grip on each other.

    Mind you, there are many complex scenes and excellent secondary roles. Notable among these are Laura Dern, Amy Adams and Rami Malek. "The Cause" is an ensemble, and Anderson has sequences set in the Pacific, in Salinas and Stockton, in Philadelphia, Lynn, Mass., and finally in England. Best not to reveal many specifics about all this. You'll want to see it all for yourself, if you care about movies. Justen Chang of Variety links The Master with There Will Be Blood by saying both have "an unrelenting focus on a borderline sociopath, a deeply scarred individual who craves a certain form of validation, yet proves mentally and emotionally incapable of receiving it from a community whose own motivations are thoroughly suspect." Chang justly praises Jonny Greenwood's delicate, original score, the crisp, lovely cinematography of Mihai Malaimare Jr. and the period accuracy of Mark Bridges' costumes and Jack Fisk and David Crank's set design. Variety's usual nod to the whole collective effort is particularly relevant when a director as brilliant as Anderson and a production as elaborate and beautifully coordinated as this one are involved. There are many other good reviews, mostly raves. I particularly like Anthony Lane's meditative one in The New Yorker, with his emphasis on the mysterious theme of the sea. Meditation is the right mode, because this is a movie to ponder as well as admire.

    There were five years between Punch Drunk Love and There Will Be Blood and five more years between that and this, Anderson's sixth film. The Master had a number of surprise 70mm US screenings before it debuted at Venice, where it won joint best actor awards for Phoenix and Hoffman and the best director prize for Anderson, and it showed again at Toronto before a NYC and LA theatrical release Sept. 14, 2012.



    [CHRIS KNIPP]
    Last edited by Chris Knipp; 09-16-2012 at 12:01 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    4,843
    I'm wondering if Johann, cinemabon and Tab1 have seen The Master. I'm surprised the thread did not generate a response. I mean, the names attached to this are big-time. It seems like a must-see, on paper. The Master is indeed an important film and you should see it.

    Having said that, I am finding it hard to embrace because I have not decided whether its ambiguity is something to cherish, or whether it is part of a cynical cop-out strategy that reflects a lack of commitment to anything but the cinema.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    15,871
    Come to think of it it seems the Oscars are passing over THE MASTER, but it is big to me. Some younger critics didn't like it. Mike D'Angelo said PTA isn't good at telling a story. I find him as interesting as Tarantino and Wes. I guess some people in outlying areas could have missed any theatrical screenings.

    What do you understand as the ambiguity?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Ottawa Canada
    Posts
    5,656

    The Captain never leaves the ship

    THE MASTER




    I had the honor of seeing this in 70mm, and I can't imagine seeing it any other way. This is pure cinema.
    No opening credits. There are many ways to take this movie, and I guess it's all up to the viewer.
    Myself, I see it as a tribute to individuality.
    The cinematography is very arresting, very immediate and intimate, despite the format.
    As Chris mentioned, there are many close-ups used VERY well. I haven't seen this many close-ups with such power in a long time.
    Stanley Kubrick would approve of this film. He loved Anderson's Boogie Nights and PT visited the set of Eyes Wide Shut.
    The final scene reminded me of Clockwork Orange, was Freddie "cured"? Being ridden by a buxom lass?
    I was smiling a lot during this movie, laughing out loud at other moments. "Laughter is the Secret" we're told at one point.
    Slow zooms, gorgeous overhead shots, such as the one of Joaquin splayed out on the top of a Navy ship, the cinematography is Marvelous.
    Top Notch.

    The two main characters (Freddie and Dodd) are very challenging.
    Did anybody like these guys?
    Riveting performances by both Joaquin Phoenix and Philip Seymour Hoffman. They both deserve Oscars.
    And so does Amy Adams. Great God what ensemble acting- the whole thing just WORKS.
    People say there is no narrative.
    Excuse me?
    Were you watching the fucking thing?
    There is one hell of a narrative going on. The whole kitchen sink is here.
    I pray for films like this. I was wondering how in the hell PT Anderson wrote this. How did he come up with these set pieces- which, by the way, this movie just builds and builds and builds. Monumental cinema in my opinion. You have to be switched on to "get" this movie. And by "get" I mean you have to really listen. "The Art of Listening" as Dodd says at one point. This movie needs the viewer engaged because if you're not, you will HATE this movie. So it's all up to you. What do you take away from it?

    I take sheer cinematic Glory from it.
    Scientology isn't even the point of it to me. The Cause isn't even the point. It's just how two men from 1950 are getting along.
    But who is The Master? Dodd? or Freddie? Or is it someone else? An abstract idea?
    What or who exactly is The Master? The director? One can make a case for PT Anderson being a Master filmmaker. He knows exactly what he's doing and I will always trust him and his Visionary films. He's got it down cold.

    Midas touch he's got. So many scenes that bolt you to your chair. I didn't look away once and had my mind blown once or twice- Freddie's fantasizing about the nude party guests- WOWZA. That's David Lynch territory, with a Laura Dern appearance to boot.

    If you love movies, this film is your bread and butter. I can't find any flaws with it. The flaws make it greater. I'm just in awe that someone made this. Made it so fearlessly and so Beautifully. Shower it with awards. Truckloads. It deserves every piece of hardware it can garner.
    Last edited by Johann; 01-15-2013 at 07:31 AM.
    "Set the controls for the heart of the Sun" - Pink Floyd

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Ottawa Canada
    Posts
    5,656
    Joaquin Phoenix was allowed to improvise on set, it says on Wikipedia.
    Some scenes seemed to be of the "Let's see where it goes" variety, with great results.

    Enthralling movie, folks.
    One you can mine.
    The performances can be studied in acting schools. That's how you get into character. Make all bets off in short order.
    I don't think it was excessively rehearsed. It doesn't seem to be. It just seems really REAL.

    A categorical TRIUMPH.
    "Set the controls for the heart of the Sun" - Pink Floyd

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    15,871
    I repeat, you are very lucky to get to see this projected in 70mm. That's how PTA shot it, and that's why he staged repeated 70mm previews of THE MASTER prior to theatrical release. I saw it at Angelika in NYC. Their projection isn't the greatest and their long narrow auditoriums aren't the best or most comfortable, and those drawbacks were the only minus of my viewing, which was still awesome. The images are gorgeous. I agree and said that Paul Thomas Anderson himself is the Master. The only other new American movie of the year that had this level of brilliance, mastery and originality was MOONRISE KINGDOM -- so two Andersons rule US cinema at the moment. And then of course DJANGO UNCHAINED. Tarantno too remains one in rich command of the medium and an original. When you see a clichéd rubber stamp of a movie like the current GANGSTER SQUAD or work by a director working way below his skill level like LAND OF PROMISE, you are not in the same universe.

    I also agree the movie is primarily about the relationship between the two men. However PTA does things with the period that are typically fresh, rich, and original; he has a sense of period that's fresher and more intense than others.

    Hope I get the opportunity to see THE MASTER in 70mm. one day too. How many more films will even be shot in this format, when the eworld is giving way to digital, and how many theaters will be able to project in this format?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Ottawa Canada
    Posts
    5,656
    It's just incredible that he chose to shoot this the way he did, maximizing the medium's potential.
    That's what it's all about. That's why Chris Nolan has IMAX cameras on his sets- to give us GOLD.
    Same thing here. Sheer cinematic glory. Who knew what was going to happen from one moment to the next?
    It just rewards in a way that is so rare and so fine...

    Good point about Moonrise Kingdom. It holds the same clout as this one. Two crown jewels of American cinema.
    It ain't dead, no not at all.
    "Set the controls for the heart of the Sun" - Pink Floyd

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    15,871
    Who knew what was going to happen from one moment to the next?
    That's what I feel. You absolutely were prepared be surprised -- Phoenix's intensity and the improvisation added to that. What are they going to say next? The movie was unique in that way of all the year's other ones. But my other two top choices go there too, MOONRISE KINGDOM and DJANGO UNCHAINED. You're on the edge of your seat, because the director knows things you don't know. Or maybe he didn't even know. Surprise me, Joaquim! And he does. He and Hoffman together on the screen are very alive and fresh.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Ottawa Canada
    Posts
    5,656
    My favorite scene in THE MASTER was the one where Joaquin says he wants to fart in that guys face.
    Hoffman says : "FAIL" x2.

    I almost fell out of my seat at the surreality...What a fucking movie, man...
    "Set the controls for the heart of the Sun" - Pink Floyd

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    15,871
    You make me want to see it again. I always have known I needed to see it again.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •