Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Mike White: Brad's Status (2017)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    SF Bay Area

    Mike White: Brad's Status (2017)



    Upper middle class envy

    Brad's Status, the fourth film where actor and writer Mike White also directs, is about a man whose life is fine who nonetheless becomes dissatisfied with it and goes through a midlife crisis, just when he and his son go on a trip to Boston for the boy to interview for colleges. The college application story and the personal crisis dovetail neatly: both are on the cusp of competitiveness and status. However, compared to some of White's movies, which were hilarious or edgy, Brad's Status is flat. I felt like I was watching an unusually glossy classroom instructional film, a morally upbeat one about accepting our choices and appreciating who we are. Still, the cast is good and the movie is a reasonably entertaining watch.

    Brad, whose voiceover dominates the movie, is forty-seven years old, like White. They went to live in Sacramento, "a second tier city," as he now calls it disparagingly, because his wife's government job was there. He left careers first in journalism, then magazine publishing, to start a small non-profit that raises money for good causes through social media. His wife Melanie (Jenna Fischer) tells him their life is perfectly fine. They have all they need. But he can't sleep. He is comparing himself unfavorably with four high achievers who were best friends of his in college. As Brad ruminates, we see quick visualizations of how those other guys live. One is a famous writer often on TV, another made a fortune and has retired to Hawaii with two young girl friends. Another is a successful Hollywood director - for which, humorously, White himself plays a cameo as an exaggeratedly gay Hollywood personality who had a flamboyant gay wedding and whose house was on the cover of Architectural Digest.

    Instead of appreciating - or being indifferent to - his classmates' accomplishments, Brad feels envious of them and senses them as reproaches. White has some fun with all these details of the fantasies and the realities. But the way they feel like tokens being pushed around made The New Yorker'sRichard Brody describe this movie as like a "PowerPoint" lecture. This is part of the point, though, and I'm not sure it's a serious fault: Brad's sense of these "better off" classmates is abstract, and the only person's life he can know is his own, which he just needs to learn to appreciate.

    It turns out Brad's college-bound son Troy (the hyper-composed Austin Abrams), a gifted keyboard artist as well as a composer,is a bigger deal than Brad realized. Troy has been told by his guidance counselor that he can get into any college he applies to, including Yale. That excites Brad, till he discovers Troy prefers Harvard, because of a music teacher there. But they also go to visit Tufts, Brad's alma mater. Brad feels out-matched by Troy already, and also tempted (prematurely) to start living through Troy's future successes. Just as we see Brad's technicolor fantasies of those high-achieving college buddies, we see his alternate scenarios of Troy's future successes. Or his failure. Since Troy's main talent is in music, Brad realizes that he might wind up a busker on the street. But he also excitedly visualizes him as a Silicon Valley billionaire on the cover of Wired.

    All the movies' elements come into play when it turns out the brilliant Troy has nonetheless goofed up on dates, and they're a day late for his Harvard interview. An alumni interview back home will have to do, and the admissions officials assure them alumni interviews have equal status. Status? No. They can't be equal. And Brad gets on the phone to persuade his estranged hotshot pales to pull the necessary strings to get Troy an interview at Harvard pdq. The preternaturally mature Troy is still totally mortified at his father's frantic, uncool behavior. It nonetheless succeeds - perhaps sending a rather mixed message to the viewer.

    Well, no Harvard aspirants were harmed in the making of this movie, but what happens is we, and Brad, get the lesson that those hotshots really aren't so hot. The billionaire is a drunk and druggie, the bestselling author is a supercilious prick, the movie director has become flamingly gay, and the other rich guy is suffering a child's intense medical crisis.

    In a key scene for this movie's message, the insomniac Brad has a late drink with Ananya (Shazi Raja), a Harvard student of Indian parentage Troy knew in school whom they had dinner with earlier, along with a Korean-American friend, Maya (Luisa Lee). Ananya also has non-profit aspirations, and she was delighted with Bard's non-profit. But he now lets her down, saying he wishes he'd skipped the non-profit and just made a lot of money. She lectures him good on his self-dissatisfaction. Compared to the people of India, he's unimaginably rich. And so on. Brad's "failure" is upper middle-class failure, which is to say not failure at all. Ananya is a non-white woman to lecture the white audience, as Selma Hayek also did in White's other movie this year, Dinner with Beatriz, which his regular collaborator Miguel Arteta directed. That movie taught us about politics and class, as this one teaches us about self-respect.

    The movie ends with several spliced-together scenes, first a dinner where Brad learns the famous writer Craig Fisher (the chameleonic Martin Sheen) is indeed an asshole, but not before Craig passes on some damning gossip about the other hotshot classmates; and then a corny concert scene where Ananya and Maya perform (they're both accomplished musicians, obviously) and Brad bursts into tears with his voiceover mouthing platitudes about life.

    Where the movie excels is in the way Stiller can convey handsome insecurity. (He looks so distinguished now in his early fifties that it's a bit hard to see him as weighed down by a sense of inadequacy., though.) And he and Austin Abrams play off each other so nicely, Stiller hyper, Abrams zen. It's dangerous to lecture the audience though, as White has Ananya do.

    Brad's Status, 101 mins., debuted at Toronto 9 Sept. 2017, opened in US theaters 15 Sept
    Last edited by Chris Knipp; 09-17-2017 at 09:14 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    SF Bay Area
    Further comments on Mike White's Brad's Status.

    In a way this shows that Mike White is still unpredictable. Now he can lecture us, and he's making movies to pour out what he's learned about class and politics (Dinner with Beatriz, directed by Miguel Artega) and now appreciating one's self-worth. But we've lost something. For me Mike White will always be the Solandz-lite provocation of Chuck and Buck, which he wrote and acted in but was directed by Arteta. I hated this movie, which was cringe-worthy and seemed homophobic, and which the openly bisexual White plays a clueless gay man stalking a guy he had a gay fling with when they were very young. Chuck and Buck is irritating and disturbing. White is justly admired for writing movies that, while having some edge to them, are quite fun: What he's doing in his fourth writer-director outing, Brad's Status, starring Ben Stiller, is different.

    White isn't an auteur, particularly, because he's been a hired gun. Tad Friend reports in the new New Yorker (Sept. 18, 2017) that White admits he'll have to accept being included in the credits for the absolutely despised The Emoji Movie (Metacritic 12%!) because doing so will mean some "real money" ($300,000 plus box office. Three weeks working on The Emoji Movie, he says enabled him to make Brad's Status. But White says this involvement in The Emoji Movie isn't as bad his gay father's ghost writing for the homophobic Jerry Falwell, of which his father was ashamed. We might conclude that Mike White is gifted, fluent, but confused, blown by the winds of opportunity and economic necessity in Hollywood.

    What's best about Brad's Status are the cringe-worthy scenes when Troy misses his Harvard interview and his father tries to push the admissions people to fit him anyway. The actor Austin Abrams is fun to watch because of his restraint: he can do a lot with silences and pouts. He comes off as more grown up than his dad. It's briefly amusing to see White himself in a brief walk-on role as one of the five envied former comrades, a flamingly gay director who becomes more and more flaming as he becomes more visible and successful in Hollywood. White can also, of course, milk the situation for hints of the father preparing to live through his son, who has (somewhat implausibly) turned out at this last minute to be far more potentially successful than Brad, likely to get in wherever he applies.
    Last edited by Chris Knipp; 09-17-2017 at 04:09 PM.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts