I like being able to watch close to 60 films rather than 28, but there are drawbacks, of course.

I don't see any advantages. Beyond a certain point one becomes saturated, and to write intelligently about three films a day is something one can't do for long. It's too wearing and becomes like cramming for an exam. You can say something coherent the next day, but next month you've forgotten most of it. The brain needs time to digest. It needs space, time free of static and overstimulation. Of course if you're just sifting through to see if something is worth distribution, worth hyping; worth coming back to later, one can learn to flit in and out like a butterfly making a few mental notes. But that's not the process I've come to enjoy.

I have a feeling you somewhat underrate Jindabyne. I can see it may have some flaws, but it also sounds very interesting and well acted. Lawrence showed a desire to work on many levels in Lantana, which is good but not so marvelous that this would have to be seen as a terrible falling off just because it has some dubious edits and is a little overcomplicated or feels padded in places compared to Altman and the Carver story. (Not many people or films could be as spare as Carver's stories.) I would guess Jindabyne might be worthy of serious and thorough discussion. Anyway I'd like to see it and judge for myself.