Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Another coup in the Americas

Threaded View

  1. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    CA/NY
    Posts
    16,770
    Hombres armados is definitely a good cinematic reference here. I don't see how you can say, JustiFied, that The Revolution Will Not Be Televised makes you feel paranoid, and still use a phrase like Aristide was the source of instability and "he had to go."

    They were saying that U.S. marines led him away in handcuffs to an undisclosed location.
    I wonder whyever they would say such a thing!

    My opinion is that the Bush Administration really just wants stability in Haiti. . .
    Yes, indeed they do.

    And one could ask as with Iraq but more obviously, "What is the danger from that country to us?" And what does "stability" mean, and what is the advantage of it to "us"?

    What does "He had to go" mean? Who decides? What about elective democracy?

    I can say Bush "has to go," but I would mean he should be voted out, or at the most radical impeached, not that he should be driven from office or kidnapped and taken to the Central Republic of Africa. Though some have suggested that he be flown to Mars, that is only a joke!

    It seems like Americans have a double standard, one for ourselves, and another for everybody outside the First World.

    [
    Last edited by Chris Knipp; 03-01-2004 at 10:23 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •